Thursday, February 7, 2008

Love?!... (Part 2)

The luxury of this being only a blog, I don’t have to persuade you of anything, instead lay my philosophies on the table for consideration and entertaining. (For the telling of the discussion at Sonic I made up names using Greek and Latin, which represent the four.)

Love, as I stated before is indescribable, thus impossible for all understanding to be put into words. However, I say to consider and ponder on such topics in the pursuit and search of greater wisdom.

A person cannot craft love. Love does not birth with a new baby with love created inside that person as if it has physical members or traits, if all died off love would still remain even though no one resides to witness it, nor does it form when a couple begins to share a relationship. Love does not start and does not end. One does not kill it, destroy it, break it, or cease it. Love does not exist physically or bare just one brand but has several appearances. Just as the laws of Good and Evil exist without the presence of man so does the essence of love. I would say, from out of what I read in the Bible, people receive the capacity to love only from God. If God did not exist neither would love. It comes to us as an extension of His good will. Our partnership with his image gives the ability to share in his love and manage it.

These are the four at sonic; Peoden which means ‘king,’ Meglaphilos which means ‘great friend,’ Apatoma which means ‘short one,’ and Monachardi which means the one heart. The four discussed, and as I stated in the prior post, came first to choice. Apotoma spoke quickly; “it’s a choice.” All had accordance and claimed that emotion seemed a mute point in time and place. One must decide to exhibit faith through peace or turmoil. Love must embody a commitment, an oath, a contract, and a conscious reaction to one another by never ceasing indenture. This even shows its merit in friendship. Two people with similar interests decide to devote time in the other. And the four agreed unanimously, a good sign and start.

In English, the common communication tosses around the word love carelessly, “I love my car,” “I love this movie” or “I love this picture.” English relinquishes the word of all boundaries and flooding it with meaningless mention weakening the word to all meaning of interest. Monachardi spoke up and brought this to light. The Greeks did not have the word Love, instead a system of four words separating connotations, Agapae (godly love), Phila (friendship), Eros (passionate or sexual), and storgay (parent to child). They never put so much meaning into just one word instead English does. I went to a thesaurus to look up synonyms for our English Love and I found this: fondness, tenderness, warmth, intimacy, attachment, endearment, devotion, adoration, doting, idolization, worship, passion, ardor, desire, lust, yearning, infatuation, and bestowed, compassion, care, caring, regard, solicitude, concern, friendliness, friendship, kindness, charity, goodwill, sympathy, kindliness, altruism, unselfishness, philanthropy, benevolence, and feelings for. I gave you barely half. Love is too complex to throw into one idea, belief, or word and it shows carelessness, ignorance, and neglect. I hope you understand… The others took note of the unveiled reasoning and discussed. From then on the word love became adjoined with a prefix like friendly-love or godly-love.

Enough for now… I shall continue later.

No comments: